From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 26, 1996
230 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

August 26, 1996


Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered September 12, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a reconstruction hearing and report in accordance herewith and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court shall issue its report with all convenient speed.

A reconstruction hearing is necessary to determine whether the defense counsel consented to certain parenthetical phrases contained in the verdict sheet (see, People v Damiano, 87 N.Y.2d 477).

We reach no other issues at this time. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 26, 1996
230 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY ROSS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 26, 1996

Citations

230 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 638

Citing Cases

People v. Ross

On appeal defendant claimed that the trial court (1) improperly submitted a verdict sheet that included…

People v. Knight

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with…