From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rosenfeld

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Dec 6, 2011
G043916 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 6, 2011)

Opinion

G043916

12-06-2011

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ETHAN EMANUEL ROSENFELD, Defendant and Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Super. Ct. No. 06CF3373)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

It is ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on November 29, 2011, be modified as follows:

1. On page 2, third sentence of the first full paragraph, the word "premedication" is changed to "premeditation" so the sentence reads:

"We agree there was no evidence of deliberation and premeditation."
This modification does not change the judgment.

MOORE, ACTING P. J. I CONCUR: ARONSON, J.


Summaries of

People v. Rosenfeld

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Dec 6, 2011
G043916 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 6, 2011)
Case details for

People v. Rosenfeld

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ETHAN EMANUEL ROSENFELD…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

Date published: Dec 6, 2011

Citations

G043916 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 6, 2011)