From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rose

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 11, 1992
599 N.E.2d 690 (N.Y. 1992)

Opinion

Argued May 5, 1992

Decided June 11, 1992


Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, William T. Martin, J. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney (Jonathan R. Walsh and Peter D. Coddington of counsel), for appellant.

Stephen R. Scarborough and Philip L. Weinstein for respondent.

Order affirmed (see, People v Dokes, 79 N.Y.2d 656 [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

People v. Rose

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 11, 1992
599 N.E.2d 690 (N.Y. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. SAMUEL ROSE, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 11, 1992

Citations

599 N.E.2d 690 (N.Y. 1992)
599 N.E.2d 690
587 N.Y.S.2d 286

Citing Cases

People v. Mitchell

The issue for immediate resolution is whether defendant has a remedy, either in anticipation of appeal (as in…

People v. Favor

We also held that a violation of this right ordinarily requires reversal even in the absence of a timely…