From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 11, 1985
108 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

February 11, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.).


Judgments affirmed.

Under the circumstances, the police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant and could use his gun to bring him to a safer location ( People v Chestnut, 51 N.Y.2d 14, cert denied 449 U.S. 1018; People v Finlayson, 76 A.D.2d 670, lv denied 51 N.Y.2d 1011, cert denied 450 U.S. 931). We have examined defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 11, 1985
108 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL ROSE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1985

Citations

108 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Mateo

His attempted flight from the area upon the arrest of Morales further supports this conclusion (see…