From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1917
178 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Opinion

May, 1917.


Judgment of conviction affirmed. Held, that the remarks touching the failure of the defendant to testify in his own behalf, attributed to the district attorney, although highly reprehensible, were not prejudicial to the defendant, in view of the clear evidence of the defendant's guilt, and the prompt instruction by the trial judge to the jury to disregard such remarks. All concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1917
178 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Case details for

People v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK ROSE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1917

Citations

178 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Citing Cases

People v. Van Allen

These instructions were adequate to the situation presented by the record. ( Ruloff v. People, 45 N.Y. 213,…