From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 23, 2008
54 A.D.3d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2006-01278.

September 23, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered January 27, 2006, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted burglary in the third degree.

Arza Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Carni, JJ.


Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).


Summaries of

People v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 23, 2008
54 A.D.3d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:79 TH E PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NE W YORK, Respondent, v. DAYRON ROSE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 23, 2008

Citations

54 A.D.3d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 7162
863 N.Y.S.2d 611