From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rosario

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 21, 2016
138 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

04-21-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis ROSARIO, Defendant–Appellant.

Scott A. Rosenberg, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.


Scott A. Rosenberg, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J. at plea; Charles H. Solomon, J. at sentencing), rendered September 13, 2012, convicting defendant of attempted burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 1 ½ to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The sentencing court properly found that it had no discretion to defer defendant's mandatory surcharge (see People v. Jones, 26 N.Y.3d 730, 27 N.Y.S.3d 431, 47 N.E.3d 710 [2016] ).

SWEENY, J.P., RENWICK, SAXE, GISCHE, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rosario

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 21, 2016
138 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Rosario

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis ROSARIO…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 21, 2016

Citations

138 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3069
28 N.Y.S.3d 597

Citing Cases

People v. Tookes

In each case the First Department held that: “The sentencing court properly found that it had no discretion…

People v. Rosario

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 138 AD3d 566 (NY)…