From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Roman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1981
84 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

November 30, 1981


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Tsoucalas, J.), rendered January 6, 1981, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Upon this record it has not been established that a promise was made by the court, at the time defendant's guilty plea was accepted, with respect to the length of the sentence to be imposed. Although the court noted that the prosecutor had recommended a lesser sentence, the record is manifestly clear that the court explained to the defendant at the plea taking that no promise concerning sentence was being made and specifically stated that the recommendation would be followed only "[i]f your probation report shows that you * * * deserve a break". Concerning the sentence imposed, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the sentencing court in the absence of extraordinary circumstances (People v. Notey, 72 A.D.2d 279). We find no such circumstances in the present case, and, therefore, the sentence should not be disturbed. Defendant's remaining arguments have been considered and found to be without merit. Damiani, J.P., Titone, Lazer and Gibbons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Roman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1981
84 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

People v. Roman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TOMAS ROMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1981

Citations

84 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

People v. Tullies

We further find to be without merit the defendant's claim that the sentence imposed was excessive. There…

People v. Tritto

Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not…