From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rolland

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Nov 21, 2017
72 N.Y.S.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)

Opinion

No. 570107/15.

11-21-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Keith ROLLAND, Defendant–Appellant.


Judgment of conviction (Herbert J. Adlerberg, J.H.O.) rendered December 16, 2014, reversed on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and fine, if paid, remitted.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights ( Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 [1969] ; People v. Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013] ). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v. Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 385 n [2015] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur


Summaries of

People v. Rolland

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Nov 21, 2017
72 N.Y.S.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
Case details for

People v. Rolland

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Keith ROLLAND…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 21, 2017

Citations

72 N.Y.S.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)