From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 2006
33 A.D.3d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2003-01646.

October 10, 2006.

Application by the appellant pro se for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 6, 2005 ( People v Rogers, 19 AD3d 437), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 6, 2003.

Before: Krausman, J.P., Fisher, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appellant is granted leave to serve and file a brief on the issues of whether trial counsel became a witness against the defendant when he submitted his pro se motion pursuant to CPL 330.30, and whether the trial court should have assigned him a new attorney in connection with CPL 330.30 motion; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to County Law § 722, the following named attorney is assigned as counsel: Joseph Faraguna, Esq. PO. Box 122 Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963, and it is further,

Ordered that assigned counsel shall serve and file a brief expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules ( see 22 NYCRR 670.1 et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,

Ordered that the application is held in abeyance in the interim.


Summaries of

People v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 2006
33 A.D.3d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDRE ROGERS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 10, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7386
821 N.Y.S.2d 914