From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1996
229 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O'Brien, J.P., Goldstein, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1996
229 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIC ROGERS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 903