From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 15, 2001
283 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

May 15, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered February 18, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the first degree and four counts of grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 to 15 years on the first-degree grand larceny conviction and 3 to 9 years on the remaining convictions, and ordering defendant to pay restitution in the amount of $1,631,750, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence on the conviction for grand larceny in the first degree to 3 to 9 years, and otherwise affirmed.

Amyjane Rettew, for respondent.

Bruce D. Austern, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Lerner, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman, Marlow, JJ.


The restitution order was properly made. The requirements of Penal Law § 60.27 were satisfied because defendant did not request a restitution hearing, and the record clearly establishes the evidentiary basis of the specific amounts, which defendant conceded in his plea allocution (see, People v. Kim, 91 N.Y.2d 407). We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Rodwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 15, 2001
283 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Rodwin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD RODWIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 15, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 602

Citing Cases

People v. M&M Med. Transp., Inc.

Moreover, no objection was raised on behalf of defendant, during the plea proceeding or at sentencing, either…

People v. M & M Med. Transp., Inc.

Moreover, no objection was raised on behalf of defendant, during the plea proceeding or at sentencing, either…