Opinion
2021–03809
12-28-2022
PEOPLE of the State of New York, respondent, v. Edgar RODRIGUEZ, appellant.
Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Amanda E. Schaefer of counsel), for appellant. Raymond A. Tierney, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Grazia Divincenzo and Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.
Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Amanda E. Schaefer of counsel), for appellant.
Raymond A. Tierney, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Grazia Divincenzo and Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P., ANGELA G. IANNACCI, PAUL WOOTEN, LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Chris Ann Kelley, J.), dated May 20, 2021, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of one count of forcible touching ( Penal Law § 130.52[1] ). Following a hearing to determine the defendant's risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), the Supreme Court designated the defendant a level two sex offender (see Correction Law § 168–n ). On appeal, the defendant challenges the Supreme Court's assessment of 20 points under risk factor 4 of the risk assessment instrument. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court properly assessed 20 points under risk factor 4, as the People demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant engaged in three or more acts of sexual contact with the victim over a period of at least two weeks (see People v. Torres–Ordonez, 175 A.D.3d 595, 105 N.Y.S.3d 106 ; People v. Luebbert, 73 A.D.3d 1399, 901 N.Y.S.2d 754 ).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender.
CONNOLLY, J.P., IANNACCI, WOOTEN and WAN, JJ., concur.