From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 1999
260 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 22, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.).


The court afforded defendant a reasonable opportunity to present his contentions in support of his plea withdrawal application ( see, People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926). The court, while noting the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt and defendant's thorough plea allocution, engaged defendant in an extended colloquy regarding his unsubstantiated claims of innocence and coercion by counsel prior to properly rejecting such claims as being unfounded.

Since defendant received the minimum sentence authorized by law, discretionary review of his sentence is foreclosed (CPL 470.20).

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 1999
260 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MANUEL RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 556

Citing Cases

People v. Jack Smith

Thus, absent an enforceable appeal waiver, defendants who plead guilty do not lose their right to invoke the…

Bd. of Managers of Strivers Gardens Condo. ex rel. Unit Owners v. Moore

See 1-2 Bergman on New York Mortgage Foreclosure 2.30 (2017). This court concurs with plaintiff that in its…