From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
May 12, 2021
194 A.D.3d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2013–08550

05-12-2021

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Ismael RODRIGUEZ, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel; Spence Jones on the brief), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill and Roni C. Piplani of counsel; Eleanor Reilly on the brief), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel; Spence Jones on the brief), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill and Roni C. Piplani of counsel; Eleanor Reilly on the brief), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Stephanie Zaro, J.), dated June 24, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree. Following a hearing to determine the defendant's risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), the Supreme Court assessed a total of 115 points under the risk assessment instrument (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 3–4 [2006]) and designated the defendant a level three sex offender.

Since the defendant did not request a downward departure from his presumptive risk level in the Supreme Court, his contentions on appeal regarding a downward departure are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Eason, 192 A.D.3d 925, 140 N.Y.S.3d 731, 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 08264 [2d Dept.] ; People v. Yglesias, 180 A.D.3d 821, 822–823, 120 N.Y.S.3d 169 ). In any event, the defendant failed to establish that a downward departure was warranted (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 ; People v. Wyatt, 89 A.D.3d 112, 128, 931 N.Y.S.2d 85 ).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender.

DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
May 12, 2021
194 A.D.3d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:People of State of New York, respondent, v. Ismael Rodriguez, appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: May 12, 2021

Citations

194 A.D.3d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 3071
143 N.Y.S.3d 607

Citing Cases

People v. Valencia

Since the defendant did not request a downward departure from his presumptive risk level in the County…

People v. Valencia

Since the defendant did not request a downward departure from his presumptive risk level in the County…