Opinion
February 8, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the jury charge regarding interested witnesses was unbalanced is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, the trial court's charge adequately conveyed to the jury the appropriate standards for evaluating a witness's testimony ( see, People v. Innis, 83 N.Y.2d 653; People v. Smith, 240 A.D.2d 600; People v. Herbert, 182 A.D.2d 639).
Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.