From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 27, 1990
159 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 27, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 27, 1990
159 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 27, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
553 N.Y.S.2d 96