Opinion
June 17, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).
Ordered that the motion is denied.
Upon reviewing the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, we find that the defendant's appellate counsel satisfied the constitutional standard of effective assistance by capably presenting nonfrivolous issues for this court's consideration (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 U.S. 745; People v Purcell, 160 A.D.2d 900; People v Settembre, 152 A.D.2d 681). Kooper, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.