Opinion
March 4, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.).
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant's contentions regarding the prosecutor's summation at the trial under Indictment No. 1060/86 are, in part, unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, all are without merit.
Because the trial court repeatedly recited that the People must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standard of proof ( see, People v Taik Kwung, 186 A.D.2d 365).
In view of our determination with respect to the defendant's judgment of conviction under Indictment No. 1060/86, upon a jury verdict, there is no basis for vacatur of his plea under Indictment No. 807/80 ( cf., People v Clark, 45 N.Y.2d 432). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.