From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1990
162 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 4, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant assigns error to the summary denial of his application to suppress fingerprint evidence, claiming that it was the product of an arrest effected without probable cause. In an affirmation in support of the omnibus motion, the defense counsel alleged that prior to the defendant's arrest "[t]he arresting officers did not observe the defendant commit any criminal act nor did they have any reasonably trustworthy information which supported the conclusion that the defendant had committed a criminal act". We conclude that the court properly denied suppression of the fingerprint evidence without conducting a hearing. The supporting allegations consisted entirely of the defense counsel's legal conclusions and failed to set forth factual allegations of the defendant's or the police officers' conduct sufficient to warrant a hearing (see, CPL 710.60; People v. Reynolds, 71 N.Y.2d 552, 558; People v. Gomez, 67 N.Y.2d 843; People v. Pavesi, 144 A.D.2d 392; People v. Gill, 138 A.D.2d 738). Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1990
162 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RALPH RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
556 N.Y.S.2d 170

Citing Cases

People v. Scott

As resolution of this issue depends on "`whether the police were trying to inculpate defendant or merely…

People v. McDermott

Second, we are unpersuaded that the court erred when it summarily denied that motion, pursuant to CPL 710.60,…