From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 19, 1984
105 A.D.2d 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 19, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Donnelly, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Criminal Term did not err in excluding testimony relevant to the proposed defense of justification in the instant prosecution for criminal possession of a weapon (see People v Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126, 130). We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 19, 1984
105 A.D.2d 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Rodman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARD RODMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Swinson

To reject the issue out of hand, without adequate input from effective counsel, raises a serious…