From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 4, 1973
299 N.E.2d 257 (N.Y. 1973)

Opinion

Argued April 27, 1973

Decided May 4, 1973

Appeal from the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MILTON SHALLECK, J.

Jacob W. Friedman and Abraham Engelman for appellant.

Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel ( Jesse J. Fine and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed. The verified accusatory instrument, based entirely on nonhearsay, stated precisely the date, time, and place of the act charged, described the act as "dense smoke from incinerator stack", and specified the statutory provision allegedly violated. Thus, the instrument was sufficiently particular to meet the standard required of an information (cf. People v. Love, 306 N.Y. 18, 23-25). Whether the air pollution misdemeanor could have been charged by a "complaint" without the exactness of an information need not be determined.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, BREITEL, JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER concur.

Order affirmed in memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Rodman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 4, 1973
299 N.E.2d 257 (N.Y. 1973)
Case details for

People v. Rodman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT RODMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 4, 1973

Citations

299 N.E.2d 257 (N.Y. 1973)
299 N.E.2d 257
345 N.Y.S.2d 1013

Citing Cases

People v. Oasis Cabana Spa, Inc.

The minimum standard of due process, however, must be satisfied and an information must state the crime…

People v. MacFarlene Co.

A criminal court obtains jurisdiction over the offense charged by the filing of an information and complaint.…