From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rochford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 25, 1991
170 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 25, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, a review of the transcript of the cross-examination of one of the complainants indicates that the defendant's trial counsel was permitted to fully question this witness.

In addition, the defendant's challenges to the prosecutor's summation remarks are either without merit, or unpreserved for appellate review and do not warrant review in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rochford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 25, 1991
170 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Rochford

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH M. ROCHFORD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)