Opinion
February 25, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, a review of the transcript of the cross-examination of one of the complainants indicates that the defendant's trial counsel was permitted to fully question this witness.
In addition, the defendant's challenges to the prosecutor's summation remarks are either without merit, or unpreserved for appellate review and do not warrant review in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Balletta, JJ., concur.