Opinion
Argued January 14, 2000
February 28, 2000
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), rendered June 12, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Alan S. Axelrod of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Lori Glachman of counsel), for respondent.
CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the identification testimony of the complaining witness should have been precluded because the People failed to provide timely notice as required by CPL 710.30(1)(b). However, since the prosecutor provided good cause for the failure to provide timely notice, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion (see, CPL 710.30[2]).