Opinion
July 14, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldman, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
The complaining witness knew the defendant; therefore, the denial of that branch of the defendant's motion which was to suppress a station house showup identification was not error since it was confirmatory in nature (see, People v Charles, 111 A.D.2d 405).
The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved (see, People v Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818, 819) and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Thompson and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.