Opinion
November 4, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Glass, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant's claim that a portion of the court's charge could be interpreted as shifting the burden of proof is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Thomas, 50 N.Y.2d 467). In any event, examination of the entire charge indicates that the concept of reasonable doubt was correctly explained to the jury (see, People v Ortiz, 92 A.D.2d 595). We have considered such other of defendant's contentions as have been preserved for our review and find them to be lacking in merit. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Thompson and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.