From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Robert Salisbury

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 29, 1966
18 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. 1966)

Summary

In People v. Salisbury, 18 N.Y.2d 899, 276 N.Y.S.2d 634, 223 N.E.2d 43 (1966), the Court of Appeals sustained (without opinion) the constitutionality of the statute against the proposition that it was unconstitutionally vague.

Summary of this case from Gesicki v. Oswald

Opinion

Argued October 20, 1966

Decided November 29, 1966

Appeal from the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, T. VINCENT QUINN, J.

Malvine Nathanson and Anthony F. Marra for appellant.

Nat H. Hentel, District Attorney ( Benj. J. Jacobson of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.


Summaries of

People v. Robert Salisbury

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 29, 1966
18 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. 1966)

In People v. Salisbury, 18 N.Y.2d 899, 276 N.Y.S.2d 634, 223 N.E.2d 43 (1966), the Court of Appeals sustained (without opinion) the constitutionality of the statute against the proposition that it was unconstitutionally vague.

Summary of this case from Gesicki v. Oswald
Case details for

People v. Robert Salisbury

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT SALISBURY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 29, 1966

Citations

18 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. 1966)
276 N.Y.S.2d 634
223 N.E.2d 43

Citing Cases

People v. Allen

Appellants attack the constitutionality of the statute for vagueness and for opening the possibility of…

Matter of Patricia A.

The underlying principle is that no man shall be held criminally responsible for conduct which he could not…