From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Roach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 1992
188 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 7, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove his guilt of felony murder (see also, People v Burch, 188 A.D.2d 479 [decided herewith]). Additionally, the defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the court erred in failing to elaborate in its charge on the meaning of "forcible stealing" (see, People v Burch, supra). In any event, any error in that regard was harmless (see, People v Spencer, 188 A.D.2d 498 [decided herewith]).

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Roach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 1992
188 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Roach

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GREGG ROACH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 416

Citing Cases

People v. Robinson

The defendant's contention that the court erred in failing, in its charge, to elaborate on the meaning of…

People v. Fraiser

The defendant's claim that the court erred in failing to elaborate in its jury charge on the meaning of the…