Opinion
February 11, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
Ordered that the application is denied.
A review of the brief submitted in behalf of the defendant indicates that his appellate counsel capably presented several nonfrivolous issues for this court's consideration. The defendant's appellate counsel clearly satisfied the constitutional standard of effective assistance of appellate counsel set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v Barnes ( 463 U.S. 745). Mangano, P.J., Brown, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.