From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2000
270 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 31, 2000

March 17, 2000

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), rendered November 13, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Edward Irizarry, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Leonard Joblove of counsel), for respondent.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to provide the People with reasonable notice of his motion to dismiss the indictment (see, CPL 30.30 Crim. Proc.; CPL 210.45 Crim. Proc.[1]; People v. Lawrence, 64 N.Y.2d 200, 203; People v. Baxter, 216 A.D.2d 931; People v. Harvall, 196 A.D.2d 553, 554). In any event, we find that the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 Crim. Proc. (see, People v. Stirrup, 91 N.Y.2d 434; People v. Harris, 82 N.Y.2d 409).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

MANGANO, P.J., BRACKEN, LUCIANO, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2000
270 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. SANTIAGO RIVERA, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 17, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 873

Citing Cases

Rivera v. McGinnis

In any event, we find that the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion." People v. Rivera, 270…

People v. Wisdom

endar months—here, 182 days ( see People v. Cortes, 80 N.Y.2d at 208 n. 3, 590 N.Y.S.2d 9, 604 N.E.2d 71)—of…