From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rivera

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 28, 1978
45 N.Y.2d 989 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued October 20, 1978

Decided November 28, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MAX BLOOM, J.

Steven G. Eckhaus, Milton M. Rosenberg and Arthur M. Unterman for appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney (Edward G. Spell and Steven R. Kartagener of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed on the opinion by Mr. Justice SAMUEL J. SILVERMAN at the Appellate Division ( 58 A.D.2d 147), except to note that the averments in the attorney's affidavit are more properly admissible under the rule governing "informal judicial admissions" described in section 217 of Richardson on Evidence (10th ed) rather than the rule governing "formal judicial admissions" described by Richardson in section 216 of his treatise. Informal judicial admissions, as distinguished from formal judicial admissions, are not conclusive on the defendant in the litigation.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.


Summaries of

People v. Rivera

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 28, 1978
45 N.Y.2d 989 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

People v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANGEL RIVERA, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 28, 1978

Citations

45 N.Y.2d 989 (N.Y. 1978)
413 N.Y.S.2d 146
385 N.E.2d 1073

Citing Cases

People v. Brown

DISCUSSION In both of these appeals, the Appellate Division relied upon People v. Rivera ( 58 A.D.2d 147 [1st…

Kegg v. Truck-Rite Distribution Sys. Corp.

The Court of Appeals was confronted with the issue in (People v. Brown, 98 N.Y.2d 226, 746 N.Y.S.2d 422, 774…