From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 1994
203 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 11, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for resentencing.

The People concede that "the defendant * * * was deprived of his constitutional right to have counsel present at sentencing". Based on this concession, we reverse the sentence imposed and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for resentencing. In light of our determination, we need not address the defendant's additional argument that the sentence imposed was excessive. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Miller, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 1994
203 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE RIVERA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 904

Citing Cases

People v. Flores

The absence of this scienter requirement from the Pennsylvania burglary statute renders improper the use of…

People v. Flores

The absence of this scienter requirement from the Pennsylvania burglary statute renders improper the use of…