From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 27, 2001
288 A.D.2d 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

November 27, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Seewald, J.), rendered September 21, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

T. Charles Won, for respondent.

Natalie Rea Pro Se, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Wallach, Lerner, Rubin, Buckley, JJ.


Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The identified informant's statements provided probable cause for defendant's arrest, since the People established the informant's reliability and basis of knowledge. The informant made his statements while under arrest for possession of telephone calling cards taken in the instant robbery. That circumstance enhanced the reliability of his statements, since "it can . . . be inferred that an individual in the informant's position would not lightly mislead the police and thereby exacerbate his predicament" (People v. Comforto, 62 N.Y.2d 725, 727). Furthermore, his information was clearly based on his own personal dealings with persons who had acquired the cards. Moreover, the police, who had received descriptions of the robbers and their getaway cars from eyewitnesses, were able to verify certain aspects of the information supplied by the informant.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility and identification. Defendant's acquittal of certain charges does not warrant a different conclusion (see, People v. Rayam, 94 N.Y.2d 557). We note that the identification testimony was corroborated by evidence that defendant was found in a car that was clearly connected to the crime.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 27, 2001
288 A.D.2d 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROLANDO RIVERA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 27, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 404

Citing Cases

People v. Mitchell

Unquestionably, probable cause to arrest Defendant existed here in light of the fact that it is well settled…