From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1998
255 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 30, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the facts of this case, the trial court did not err in allowing into evidence the sworn tape-recorded statement of the defendant's brother as a past recollection recorded ( see, People v. Raja, 77 A.D.2d 322). Further, in light of the overwhelming proof of guilt, any error would have been, harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1998
255 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL RIVERA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 75

Citing Cases

People v. Rivera

May 8, 2000. Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…

People v. Linton

The record did not establish that the complainant refused to testify, but rather, at the time of the trial,…