Opinion
May 12, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.).
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). Defendant's actions, including guarding the entrance to the apartment building where there was an ongoing drug operation in one of two apartments that were the subject of a search warrant, asking the undercover officer what he wanted, looking him over to make sure he was not a threat to the operation and: directing him inside where he purchased the narcotics, established his guilt as an accomplice ( see, People v. Velasquez, 249 A.D.2d 11; People v. Wylie, 180 A.D.2d 774, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 767).
Having affirmatively stated that he did not object when the court asked if there were objections to the courtroom being closed, defendant has waived his current claim that he was denied his right to a public trial, ( see, People v. Hicks, 205 A.D.2d 478, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 868), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that the court properly closed the courtroom during the testimony of the undercover officer who indicated, inter alia, that he was currently working in the vicinity of defendant's arrest and had a major ongoing investigation there ( see, People v. Ayala, 90 N.Y.2d 490, cert denied ___ U.S. ___, 118 5 Ct 574).
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Rubin, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.