From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ring

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1938
16 N.E.2d 386 (N.Y. 1938)

Opinion

Submitted June 3, 1938

Decided July 7, 1938

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Frank P. Greenberg and Herman Gross for appellant.

William F.X. Geoghan, District Attorney ( Henry J. Walsh of counsel), for respondent.


The judgment should be affirmed. In this case there is proof, lacking in People v. Berman ( 278 N.Y. 408), decided herewith, of a delivery even though insufficient to pass title.

The judgment should be affirmed.

LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ., concur; RIPPEY, J., dissents; CRANE, Ch. J., taking no part.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Ring

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1938
16 N.E.2d 386 (N.Y. 1938)
Case details for

People v. Ring

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH RING, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1938

Citations

16 N.E.2d 386 (N.Y. 1938)
16 N.E.2d 386

Citing Cases

People (Goldsmith) v. Masback Hardware Co., Inc.

Despite the lack of actual fraud or deceit, however, a violation of the statute may exist, for "Section 188…