Opinion
December 23, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J).
Judgment affirmed.
The testimony of the arresting officer at the suppression hearing as to the circumstances surrounding the arrest and seizure of the drugs from defendant was not incredible as a matter of law. Based upon that testimony, which was credited by the court, the motion to suppress was properly denied. Gibbons, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.