From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ricketts

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 11, 2013
109 A.D.3d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-09-11

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Scherrise RICKETTS, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Diana Teverovskaya on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Diana Teverovskaya on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), imposed May 4, 2011, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of her right to appeal forecloses review of her claim that her sentence was excessive ( see People v. Cedeno, 107 A.D.3d 734, 965 N.Y.S.2d 887).

ENG, P.J., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and HALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ricketts

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 11, 2013
109 A.D.3d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Ricketts

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Scherrise RICKETTS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 11, 2013

Citations

109 A.D.3d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5841
971 N.Y.S.2d 58

Citing Cases

People v. Morrison

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver of his…