From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 3, 1975
330 N.E.2d 649 (N.Y. 1975)

Opinion

Submitted March 17, 1975

Decided April 3, 1975


Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon the following questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant-appellant argued that the failure to disclose the identity of the informant and the denial of an in camera hearing to determine if the informant possessed evidence which would exculpate defendant violated his rights under the United States Constitution. Defendant-appellant also argued that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel which violated a substantial right under the United States Constitution. The Court of Appeals held that appellant's constitutional rights were not violated.


Summaries of

People v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 3, 1975
330 N.E.2d 649 (N.Y. 1975)
Case details for

People v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH RICHARDSON…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 3, 1975

Citations

330 N.E.2d 649 (N.Y. 1975)
330 N.E.2d 649
369 N.Y.S.2d 702