Opinion
December 8, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contentions concerning the suppression of the in-court and out-of-court identifications are, in part, unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Kern, 149 A.D.2d 187, affd 75 N.Y.2d 638, cert denied 498 U.S. 824). In any event, the hearing court properly concluded that the police officers had probable cause to arrest the defendant (see, People v. Kelland, 171 A.D.2d 885; People v. Miller, 149 A.D.2d 538; People v. Diaz, 103 A.D.2d 82), and, therefore, the identification testimony was properly admitted.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.
O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.