From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 15, 1974
46 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

October 15, 1974


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered August 21, 1973, insofar as it imposes sentence, unanimously reversed on the law, and the case remanded to the Criminal Term of the Supreme Court, New York County, for resentencing, and otherwise affirmed. The record indicates and the People concede that the sentencing court imposed a term of imprisonment in excess of that agreed upon in the plea bargaining. The understanding had been, based on the People's recommendation, that a term of up to four years imprisonment would be imposed. However, while on parole in a narcotics treatment center pending sentencing, the appellant absconded, and a bench warrant had to be issued and the parole was revoked. At the sentencing, the People erroneously informed the court that no sentence promise had been made. In view of the defendant's record and the fact that he broke his parole, the Judge imposed a sentence of up to seven years' imprisonment. The reversal and remand for resentencing is required in accordance with the sentence promised. ( Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257; People v. Esposito, 32 N.Y.2d 921; People v. McFarland, 46 A.D.2d 616.) If the breaking of parole is to be taken into account, then it is for other proceedings and not for this sentencing.

Concur — McGivern, P.J., Markewich, Kupferman, Lupiano and Lane, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 15, 1974
46 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

People v. Richards

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERALD RICHARDS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1974

Citations

46 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

State v. James

Hence, specific performance of this bargain is resentencing before a different judge with the benefit of that…

People v. Hurlburt

The People argue that, because of defendant's willful flight from the jurisdiction, they were no longer bound…