From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 5, 1985
112 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

August 5, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to counsel when he was arrested and placed in a lineup without an attorney being present to represent him ( People v. Hawkins, 55 N.Y.2d 474, cert denied 459 U.S. 846; People v. Robertson, 109 A.D.2d 806).

In People v. Hawkins ( supra, p 485), the Court of Appeals expressly rejected the notion that there is a right to counsel at an investigatory lineup, conducted before the filing of an accusatory instrument, noting that there are significant differences between the active role of an attorney during interrogation and the more passive one in observing a lineup.

Defendant's remaining contentions, including those included in his pro se supplemental brief, have been considered and found to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., O'Connor, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 5, 1985
112 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Richards

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JUSTO RICHARDS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 5, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Richards

November 18, 1996. Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…

People v. Richards

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Sholom J. Twersky of counsel),…