From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Richard Goodwin

Michigan Court of Appeals
May 3, 1972
198 N.W.2d 875 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

Docket No. 11384.

Decided May 3, 1972.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Richard B. Whitney, for defendant on appeal.

Before: BRONSON, P.J., and QUINN and DANHOF, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION. Defendant was convicted of assault with intent to rob while armed, and appeals. The people have filed a motion to affirm.

Upon examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm granted.


Summaries of

People v. Richard Goodwin

Michigan Court of Appeals
May 3, 1972
198 N.W.2d 875 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

People v. Richard Goodwin

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. RICHARD GOODWIN

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: May 3, 1972

Citations

198 N.W.2d 875 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972)
40 Mich. App. 469