Opinion
No. 2009-06033.
October 26, 2010.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), dated June 12, 2009, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Joanne Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Anthea H. Bruffee, and Catherine Dagonese of counsel), for respondent
Before: Dillon, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Roman, JJ.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's request for a downward departure from his presumptive level three sex offender designation ( see People v King, 74 AD3d 1162; People v Pietarniello, 53 AD3d 475, 478; People v Taylor, 47 AD3d 907). The defendant failed to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that there exists a mitigating factor of a kind or to a degree not otherwise taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act Guidelines that warranted such a departure ( see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]; People v Pietarniello, 53 AD3d 475; People v Taylor, 47 AD3d 907).