From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Richard

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 22, 2014
121 A.D.3d 1023 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-22

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Henry RICHARD, appellant.

Matthew Muraskin, Port Jefferson, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.


Matthew Muraskin, Port Jefferson, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, (Hudson, J.), imposed May 21, 2013, upon his conviction of arson in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive ( see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145). BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Richard

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 22, 2014
121 A.D.3d 1023 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Richard

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Henry RICHARD, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 22, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 1023 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 7188
993 N.Y.S.2d 922