From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 2, 1996

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was deprived of his statutory right to a speedy trial. We disagree. CPL 30.30 (1)(a) requires the People to announce their readiness for trial within six months of the commencement of a criminal proceeding. This proceeding was commenced on December 29, 1993, the date on which this Court remitted the matter for a new trial (People v. Rice [appeal No. 1], 199 A.D.2d 1054). The People announced their readiness for trial on June 20, 1994, within six months of the commencement of the proceeding, and, thus, defendant's statutory right to a speedy trial was not violated (see, CPL 30.30 [a]; see generally, People v Wilson, 188 A.D.2d 671, after remand 207 A.D.2d 849, affd 86 N.Y.2d 753).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Rice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Rice

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAJUANE RICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 847

Citing Cases

People v. Rice

By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant has failed to…

People v. Reres

Pursuant to CPL § 30.30(5)(a), after a mistrial is declared, chargeable time starts to run a new for purposes…