Opinion
April 11, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).
The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Rogelio, 79 N.Y.2d 843; People v Allen, 177 A.D.2d 700) and, in any event, without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.