From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Oct 27, 2021
No. 2019-09876 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2019-09876 Ind. 1179/18

10-27-2021

The People, etc., respondent, v. Dayron Rhodes, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Antonio Villaamil of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.


Submitted - September 29, 2021

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Antonio Villaamil of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P. ROBERT J. MILLER FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY ANGELA G. IANNACCI DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jane C. Tully, J.), imposed October 3, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

DILLON, JP, MILLER, CONNOLLY, IANNACCI and DOWLING, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Oct 27, 2021
No. 2019-09876 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 27, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Rhodes

Case Details

Full title:The People, etc., respondent, v. Dayron Rhodes, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Oct 27, 2021

Citations

No. 2019-09876 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 27, 2021)