From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rho

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Oct 20, 2021
No. 2021-05728 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2021-05728 2018-09047

10-20-2021

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Robert Rho, appellant. Ind. No. 2058/16

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Hannah Gladstein of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (William H. Branigan and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Hannah Gladstein of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (William H. Branigan and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gregory Lasak, J.), imposed June 26, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, CONNOLLY, IANNACCI and DOWLING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rho

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Oct 20, 2021
No. 2021-05728 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 20, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Rho

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Robert Rho, appellant…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-05728 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 20, 2021)