From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rhew

Supreme Court of California,Department Two
Dec 14, 1901
135 Cal. 75 (Cal. 1901)

Opinion

Crim. No. 811.

December 14, 1901.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. E.N. Rector, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the opinion in the case of People v. Baumgartner, ante, p. 72.

V.G. Frost, and Ben Berry, for Appellant.

Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, and A.A. Moore, Jr., Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


Defendant was tried on an information jointly charging him and one William Baumgartner and one Julian Rhew with violating sepulture. The facts in this case are the same as were presented in People v. Baumgartner, ante, p. 72. Defendant was convicted, and appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The question as to the proper construction to be given the word "disinter," as found in section 290 of the Penal Code, arises in this case as it did in People v. Baumgartner; the same instruction was given by the court which was held to be error in People v. Baumgartner. The two cases can be distinguished neither in their facts nor in the questions of law presented. Upon the authority of People v. Baumgartner, the judgment of conviction is reversed.


Summaries of

People v. Rhew

Supreme Court of California,Department Two
Dec 14, 1901
135 Cal. 75 (Cal. 1901)
Case details for

People v. Rhew

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. EMMET RHEW, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court of California,Department Two

Date published: Dec 14, 1901

Citations

135 Cal. 75 (Cal. 1901)
66 P. 1081